All our Essay orders are Original, and are written from scratch. Try us today at 30% off

Using the information provided in this case study and your own research, draw

Want answers to the assignment Below?

Text or Whatsapp Olivia at +1 (307) 209-4351


 

This case-study[JC1] (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-18008171) highlights the potentially disastrous consequences of making the wrong decision, and what kind of costs can be incurred in attempting to reverse them. In fact, as we shall see, sometimes it is arguably better to let a bad decision stand and work within the new reality as best as possible, rather than complicate things further by overturning it.

The article refers to the British F-35 program, which is a contemporary project aimed at providing a new generation of warplanes to equip the Royal Navy’s aircraft carriers. The old generation of planes were retired in 2010, leaving a potentially dangerous capability gap in the British military. Several years prior, the under-developed F-35 aircraft had been selected as the replacement, even though it was known that it would not be ready to enter service in 2010. The government at the time had also decided to buy the F-35 B variant, which was designed to take off and land vertically. However, in 2010, a new government decided to opt instead for the F-35 C variant, which can only take off and land conventionally, but are cheaper on a per-plane basis, and boast an increased range and payload capacity.

Then, as the article details, in 2012 the same government reversed its decision and settled on the choice originally made by the previous government. Primarily, this was due to a realization that the F-35 C would not be able to enter service until 2023, whereas the F-35 B was scheduled for 2020. The precise cost of this U-turn is disputed, but most estimates place it in the region of £100 million, and potentially as much as £250 million. As well as these additional financial costs, the lost capability of the F-35 C must be taken into account. For this reason, many of the critics who disagreed with the government’s initial decision to buy the F-35 C in 2010 also strongly criticized the decision to revert back to the F-35 B.

Discussion Questions

1. Using the information provided in this case study and your own research, draw a decision tree for the F-35 program starting from 2010, just before the decision to buy the C variant.

2. Using the decision tree you have produced, discuss what you believe to be the best course of action.

Submit discussion answer (Max: 2000 words)

This case

study[JC1]

(

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk

politics

18008171

)

highlights the potentially

disastrous consequences of making the wrong decision, and what kind of costs can be incurred in

attempting to reverse them. In fact, as we shall see, sometimes it is arguably better

to let a bad

decision stand and work within the new reality as best as possible, rather than complicate things

further by overturning it.

The article refers to the British F

35 program, which is a contemporary project aimed at providing a

new generation

of warplanes to equip the Royal Navy’s aircraft carriers. The old generation of planes

were retired in 2010, leaving a potentially dangerous capability gap in the British military. Several

years prior, the under

developed F

35 aircraft had been selected as

the replacement, even though it

was known that it would not be ready to enter service in 2010. The government at the time had also

decided to buy the F

35 B variant, which was designed to take off and land vertically. However, in

2010, a new government de

cided to opt instead for the F

35 C variant, which can only take off and

land conventionally, but are cheaper on a per

plane basis, and boast an increased range and payload

capacity.

Then, as the article details, in 2012 the same government reversed its

decision and settled on the

choice originally made by the previous government. Primarily, this was due to a realization that the

F

35 C would not be able to enter service until 2023, whereas the F

35 B was scheduled for 2020.

The precise cost of this U

tur

n is disputed, but most estimates place it in the region of £100 million,

and potentially as much as £250 million. As well as these additional financial costs, the lost capability

of the F

35 C must be taken into account. For this reason, many of the criti

cs who disagreed with the

government’s initial decision to buy the F

35 C in 2010 also strongly criticized the decision to revert

back to the F

35 B.

Discussion Questions

1. Using the information provided in this case study and your own research, draw

a decision tree for

the F

35 program starting from 2010, just before the decision to buy the C variant.

2. Using the decision tree you have produced, discuss what you believe to be the best course of

action.

Submit discussion answer (Max: 2000 words)

This case-study[JC1] (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-18008171) highlights the potentially

disastrous consequences of making the wrong decision, and what kind of costs can be incurred in

attempting to reverse them. In fact, as we shall see, sometimes it is arguably better to let a bad

decision stand and work within the new reality as best as possible, rather than complicate things

further by overturning it.

The article refers to the British F-35 program, which is a contemporary project aimed at providing a

new generation of warplanes to equip the Royal Navy’s aircraft carriers. The old generation of planes

were retired in 2010, leaving a potentially dangerous capability gap in the British military. Several

years prior, the under-developed F-35 aircraft had been selected as the replacement, even though it

was known that it would not be ready to enter service in 2010. The government at the time had also

decided to buy the F-35 B variant, which was designed to take off and land vertically. However, in

2010, a new government decided to opt instead for the F-35 C variant, which can only take off and

land conventionally, but are cheaper on a per-plane basis, and boast an increased range and payload

capacity.

Then, as the article details, in 2012 the same government reversed its decision and settled on the

choice originally made by the previous government. Primarily, this was due to a realization that the

F-35 C would not be able to enter service until 2023, whereas the F-35 B was scheduled for 2020.

The precise cost of this U-turn is disputed, but most estimates place it in the region of £100 million,

and potentially as much as £250 million. As well as these additional financial costs, the lost capability

of the F-35 C must be taken into account. For this reason, many of the critics who disagreed with the

government’s initial decision to buy the F-35 C in 2010 also strongly criticized the decision to revert

back to the F-35 B.

Discussion Questions

1. Using the information provided in this case study and your own research, draw a decision tree for

the F-35 program starting from 2010, just before the decision to buy the C variant.

2. Using the decision tree you have produced, discuss what you believe to be the best course of

action.

Submit discussion answer (Max: 2000 words)
The post Using the information provided in this case study and your own research, draw first appeared on Assignment writing service.

  

Testimonials

Comes through every time

I have used this website for many times, and each time they found perfect writers for me and they produce...

Best Service

The book review I asked for is so amazing! Endless thanks to your team for completing my review and for...

Great Job

Great job! Those were you, guys, who made my coursework perfect in time according to all my requirements. I will...

Mh! not bad…

The worst part ever was to find my deadline postponed for 1 hour ! They couldn`t finish the essay within...

No Complaints So far Guys

Yeah …I really like all the discounts that they offer, the prices are very flexible. Plus they have different promotions...

Best

They look cool and trustworthy enough to me. I gather they made discounts as their prices are quite affordable if...

CLICK HERE  To order your paper

About Scholarfront Essay writing service

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for upto 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

 CLICK HERE to Order Your Assignment

 

ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT

Let your paper be done by an expert

Custom Essay Writing Service

Our custom essay writing service has already gained a positive reputation in this business field. Understandably so, all custom papers produced by our academic writers are individually crafted from scratch and written according to all your instructions and requirements. We offer Havard, APA, MLA, or Chicago style papers in more than 70 disciplines. With our writing service, you can get quality custom essays, as well as a dissertation, a research paper, or term papers for an affordable price. Any paper will be written on time for a cheap price.

Professional Essay writing service

When professional help in completing any kind of homework is all you need, scholarfront.com is the right place to get it. We guarantee you help in all kinds of academia, including essay, coursework, research, or term paper help etc., it is no problem for us. With our cheap essay writing service, you can be sure to get credible academic aid for a reasonable price, as the name of our website suggests. For years, we have been providing online custom writing assistance to students from countries all over the world, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, New Zealand, China, and Japan.