All our Essay orders are Original, and are written from scratch. Try us today at 30% off

PHIL DICUSSION

Module 5 Discussion: Teleological and Cosmological Argument
 
Module 5’s discussion questions will focus on the content of our textbook’s Chapter 4 Section 4.0-4.2 and 4.4-4.5.
Early and continuing participation in these ongoing online “class discussions” is expected throughout the entire duration of each Module. I strongly recommend reading and contributing to these discussions on at least three days a week, every week.
This discussion forum will close at the end of Module 5, after which time no additional discussion posts may be submitted.
Discussion Question A
Theistic Arguments: With respect to the teleological argument, cosmological argument or Pascal’s wager, which do you believe is the best argument to show that God exists? Carefully explain your reasoning, and please reference concepts from the text when applicable.
Discussion Question B
Problem of Evil: In its classic form, the problem of evil is an argument against the existence of God as traditionally understood. Consider the following version of the argument as rendered by Lawhead:
1. God is perfectly good (omnibenevolent).
2. God is all-knowing (omniscient).
3. God is is all-powerful (omnipotent).
4. Evil exists.
5. If God exists and is a being who is good, all-knowing, and all-powerful, then there would be no evil in the world.
6. Therefore, God does not exist.
Of the different solutions presented in the Module, which one is most compelling? Or is the argument ultimately sound? Carefully explain your reasoning, and please reference concepts from the text when applicable.
Instructions
1. First, respond to EACH of the two Module 5 Discussion Questions presented above (both questions A & B).
2. Then, provide additional subsequent follow-up responses to posts submitted by others (your fellow students, and/or myself) in BOTH of the subsequent discussion threads that will begin to develop and unfold as this Module proceeds.
 
Chapter can be found here: https://online.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781260132519/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3DCover]!/4/2/2/2%4051:1
 
Email login: Welbeezy22@gmail.com
Password: Pepsi531!
 
Reply to 2 peer’s responses of 150 words each
 
Peer 1: Emily Champion
The cosmological argument more argues that anything caused has to be caused by something else. So, everything we know is caused by God, but it doesn’t tell us what caused God to be. The teleological argument argues that everything has a creator and a purpose, but much in life can’t be explained. I believe Pascal’s wager is the best argument of God’s existence. It argues that sometimes a leap of faith is the reason to believe. The creation of God can’t be scientifically explained, many believe in God because they have faith in him. The phrase, “faith over fear,” is we must have faith than fear.
“Aquinas & the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10.” YouTube, CrashCourse, 11 Apr. 2016, https://youtu.be/TgisehuGOyY. Accessed 27 Oct. 2021.
“Indiana Jones & Pascal’s Wager: Crash Course Philosophy #15.” YouTube, CrashCourse, 23 May 2016, https://youtu.be/S93jMOqF-oE. Accessed 27 Oct. 2021.
“Intelligent Design: Crash Course Philosophy #11.” YouTube, CrashCourse, 25 Apr. 2016, https://youtu.be/7e9v_fsZB6A. Accessed 27 Oct. 2021.
 
 
 
Peer 2: Wes Porter
Discussion Question A
The teleological argument presents the best case for God out of the three. Pascal’s wager makes a good argument for believing in God based on the risk/reward factor and the cosmological argument makes sense for identifying the root cause of the universe, but neither make as valid of a direct case for divine intervention as the teleological argument. Pascal’s wager simply says that we “should” believe in God for the simple reason that if we don’t, the risk we’re taking is too great. If we believe in God, our reward will be eternal life, if not, we suffer eternal damnation. We prosper for the simple sake of belief, and lose nothing if God doesn’t exist. This does a good job of making us want to believe, but not a good job of proving God exists. The Cosmological argument stems from the fact that the universe exists, and therefore should have a root cause that started it all. The problem with this argument is that even though God is a viable option for the starter of the universe, God certainly isn’t the only imaginable cause. The teleological argument makes the best case for a divine hand in the creation of the universe. Evidence of design shows that must be a designer’s hand at work, therefore the best case for a God. In William Lawhead’s words, “evidence of design implies a designer” (Lawhead, 2018, p. 332).
Discussion Question B
At first, I thought that the Greater goods defense was the weakest because its correlation between the necessity for evil to bring about better events seemed far-fetched and reaching. The free will and natural order defenses, however, seem to build upon each other in a way that promotes disbelief. The free will defense offers a handsome approach to evil in stating that God created us to have unfettered free will so that the evil in the world could be matched and bettered by good, but then relies heavily on the natural order defense to cover the subject of natural evil in the form of natural disasters. The compounding of both defenses creates a deck of cards effect for me, if neither is strong enough to stand on their own, neither can be right. The Greater goods defense then makes the best case to explain evil as a tool through which beauty, kindness, and goodness are delivered.
Lawhead, W. (2018). The Philosophical Journey: An Interactive Approach (7th Edition).
McGraw-Hill Higher Education (US). https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9781260132519
 
 

Module 5 Discussion: Teleological and
Cosmological Argument
 
 
 
Module 5’s discussion questions will focus on the content of our
textbook’s Chapter 4 Section 4.0

4.2 and 4.4

4.5.
 
Early and continuing participation in these ongoing online “class
discussions” is expected throughout the entire duration of each
Module. I strongly recommend reading and contributing to these
discussions on at least three days a week, every week.
 
This discussion forum will close at the end of Module 5, after which
time
no additional discussion posts may be submitted.
 
Discussion
 
Question
 
A
 
Theistic
 
Arguments:
 
With respect to the teleological argument,
cosmological argument or Pascal’s wager, which do you believe is the
best argument to show that God exists? Carefully expl
ain your
reasoning, and please reference concepts from the text when
applicable.
 
Discussion
 
Question
 
B
 
Problem
 
of
 
Evil:
 
In its classic form, the problem of evil is an argument
against the existence of God as traditionally understood. Consider the
following
 
version of the argument as rendered by Lawhead:
 
1.
 
God is perfectly good (omnibenevolent).
 
2.
 
God is all

knowing (omniscient).
 
3.
 
God is is all

powerful (omnipotent).
 
4.
 
Evil exists.
 
5.
 
If God exists and is a being who is good, all

knowing, and all

powerful, then there
would be no evil in the world.
 
6.
 
Therefore, God does not exist.
 
Of the different solutions presented in the Module, which one is most
compelling? Or is the argument ultimately sound? Carefully explain your
reasoning, and please reference concepts from the te
xt when
applicable.
 
Module 5 Discussion: Teleological and
Cosmological Argument
 
Module 5’s discussion questions will focus on the content of our
textbook’s Chapter 4 Section 4.0-4.2 and 4.4-4.5.
Early and continuing participation in these ongoing online “class
discussions” is expected throughout the entire duration of each
Module. I strongly recommend reading and contributing to these
discussions on at least three days a week, every week.
This discussion forum will close at the end of Module 5, after which
time no additional discussion posts may be submitted.
Discussion Question A
Theistic Arguments: With respect to the teleological argument,
cosmological argument or Pascal’s wager, which do you believe is the
best argument to show that God exists? Carefully explain your
reasoning, and please reference concepts from the text when
applicable.
Discussion Question B
Problem of Evil: In its classic form, the problem of evil is an argument
against the existence of God as traditionally understood. Consider the
following version of the argument as rendered by Lawhead:
1. God is perfectly good (omnibenevolent).
2. God is all-knowing (omniscient).
3. God is is all-powerful (omnipotent).
4. Evil exists.
5. If God exists and is a being who is good, all-knowing, and all-
powerful, then there would be no evil in the world.
6. Therefore, God does not exist.
Of the different solutions presented in the Module, which one is most
compelling? Or is the argument ultimately sound? Carefully explain your
reasoning, and please reference concepts from the text when
applicable.

The post PHIL DICUSSION first appeared on Assignment writing service.

  

Testimonials

Great Job

Great job! Those were you, guys, who made my coursework perfect in time according to all my requirements. I will...

No Complaints So far Guys

Yeah …I really like all the discounts that they offer, the prices are very flexible. Plus they have different promotions...

Mh! not bad…

The worst part ever was to find my deadline postponed for 1 hour ! They couldn`t finish the essay within...

Best

They look cool and trustworthy enough to me. I gather they made discounts as their prices are quite affordable if...

Comes through every time

I have used this website for many times, and each time they found perfect writers for me and they produce...

Best Service

The book review I asked for is so amazing! Endless thanks to your team for completing my review and for...

CLICK HERE  To order your paper

About Scholarfront Essay writing service

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for upto 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

 CLICK HERE to Order Your Assignment

 

ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT

Let your paper be done by an expert

Custom Essay Writing Service

Our custom essay writing service has already gained a positive reputation in this business field. Understandably so, all custom papers produced by our academic writers are individually crafted from scratch and written according to all your instructions and requirements. We offer Havard, APA, MLA, or Chicago style papers in more than 70 disciplines. With our writing service, you can get quality custom essays, as well as a dissertation, a research paper, or term papers for an affordable price. Any paper will be written on time for a cheap price.

Professional Essay writing service

When professional help in completing any kind of homework is all you need, scholarfront.com is the right place to get it. We guarantee you help in all kinds of academia, including essay, coursework, research, or term paper help etc., it is no problem for us. With our cheap essay writing service, you can be sure to get credible academic aid for a reasonable price, as the name of our website suggests. For years, we have been providing online custom writing assistance to students from countries all over the world, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, New Zealand, China, and Japan.